Historic Harlem Court House

The Harlem Community Justice Center's Reentry Services are located in East Harlem

2013 Reentry Graduation starts with a song

The choir started off the celebration this year at the Reentry Court Graduation

Family Reentry Summer Celebration

During the summer, we host a block party and celebration for Reentry clients and their families

Reentry Graduation

Young man thanks his Parole Officer for keeping him on track

Harlem Reentry Graduation

Families join to celebrate the accomplishments of graduates

Dec 31, 2009

Morgenthau "rests his case."

Today Robert Morgenthau, Manhattan's District Attorney for the last 35 years, steps out of office, finally "rest[ing] his case." In a CNN article today, former Assistant District Attorney, Beth Karas, chronicles Morgenthau's accomplishments and missteps. What does his departute mean for reentry in Manhattan? Check out Cy Vance's Plan to Reduce Recidivism for former offenders and his interview with the Daily News prior to his election.

Dec 30, 2009

"The first time I ever even see the judge smile"


After 35 years of incarceration, DNA proved Mr. Bain innocent of the kidnap and rape he was falsely accused and convicted of. In this bittersweet piece broadcast today by NPR's Tell Me More, Mr. Bain describes his first moments of freedom and what he wants most after three and a half decades of incarceration --a high school diploma.

Dec 29, 2009

Artistry in Service of a Gun-Free Brooklyn

Our sister project, the Crown Heights Community Mediation Center, has just posted pictures of a stunning mural that promotes peace in Central Brooklyn. An area ravaged by the gun trade and its resulting violence, Crown Heights has recently been selected for federal funding to initiate a "Ceasefire" program targeting violent offenders, building community collaboration, and bringing guns off the streets. This mural is a powerful representation not only of a deep-seated will to see the violence end, but also the variety of great talents (artistic and otherwise) that this community will marshall to address gun violence.

As their website indicates, the mural is painted on the side of a school across from the Brooklyn Children's Museum, and was and painted by sixteen youth artists and two adult painters over the summer. This piece of public art is a product of collaboration between the Mediation Center, the American Friends Service Committee, New Yorkers Against Gun Violence, Groundswell Community Mural Project, Assemblyman Karim Camara, and the Damon S. Allen Foundation.

Here are some photos of the details, as they are intricate, lovely, and thought-provoking. See all the pictures here.

Dec 28, 2009

How the Economic Downturn Creates an Uptick in Court Caseloads


The economy is not just hitting our private sector entities and state budgets -- it has also found its way to the courtroom, according to an interesting article in today's New York Times.

Mirroring national trends, our state courts are seen total caseload increase by 63,000 cases this year, including "hundreds of thousands of new cases across the judicial system, [with] people challenging their real estate taxes, home foreclosures, contract disputes and family offenses."

Read the article for more details and some interesting national comparisons to other states.

Dec 26, 2009

Megan's Law 2.0

A new Nebraskan law designed to bring Nebraska’s Sexual Offender Registry Act (Megan’s Law) into the Age of the Internet creates new barriers for former sexual offenders seeking to find and maintain jobs. While Nebraska, like all states in the U.S., has some type of Megan's law that restricts former sex offenders' ability to find employment (such as residency restrictions and community notification requirements), this new Nebraskan legislation makes finding and maintaining a job even more difficult. Among other measures, such as requiring parolees to register all of his/her internet identifiers, Legislative Bill 285

    “authorizes the sheriff to conduct a search of any computer or electronic device used by the parolee without notification,

    mandates the registrant to notify the sheriff within one day of any changes in or additions to a person’s list of email addresses and day of any content he posts or pictures he uploads,"

    and

    "forbids any person required to register to use any social networking site, instant or chat room service (including text messaging) that may be used by any individual under eighteen.”

Three ways the law will impact a former offenders job prospects

While the Nebraskan law aims to prevent individuals convicted of sex offenses from using the internet to find victims, its unintended consequences may actually increase recidivism. Researchers agree that employment is a key factor in a former offender’s ability to lead a life free of criminal behavior. Here are three ways the legislation will have an impact on a parolee's employment opportunities:

    - Today, everyone’s job search begins on the internet through sites that will now be prohibited to ex-offenders. The prohibition on accessing “social networking sites” includes many job search engines that offer the ability to create a profile and post resumes. (i.e. Idealist.org or Linked In). The law contains no exception for job-related activities, which is the equivalent of taking the Classified section from a parolee released in the 1960's.

    -The Sheriff will be authorized to search a former offender's work computer or any electronic device he uses on the job. Such a restriction will serve as an additional deterrent to those already scarce employers willing to hire individuals with criminal records.

    -A former offender is unlikely to be able to accept a position that requires him to post content on the internet, communicate via email or chat, or upload photos without violating the one day notification period mandated by the new law. The consequences for violating the one day period is a misdemeanor for the first offense and a felony for the second.

New York law, the internet, and former sex offenders

Last year, New York passed E-Stop, the Electronic Securing and Targeting of Online Predators Act, which makes an effort to address community safety while remaining mindful of the crucial role of employment in recidivism.

The preamble to the law reads: “[P]ersons on parole and probation currently face many barriers to employment and education opportunities as a result of having a criminal record. Studies indicate that access to employment and education greatly reduces the risk of recidivism by ex-offenders . Therefore any measure that restricts an offender’s use of the internet must be tailored to specifically target the types of offenses committed on the internet while not making it impossible for such offenders to successfully reintegrate back into society.”

Additionally, E-Stop

    “requires that sex offenders register all of their Internet accounts and Internet identifiers with the State Division of Criminal Justice Services,

    authorizes the Division of Criminal Justice Services to release state sex offender Internet identifiers to social networking sites and certain other online services, which may be used to pre-screen or remove sex offenders from using the site’s services and notify law enforcement authorities and other government officials of potential violations of law and threats to public safety,"

and,

    "requires, as a condition of probation or parole, mandatory restrictions on a sex offender’s access to the Internet where the offender’s victim was a minor, the Internet was used to commit the offense, or the offender was designated a level 3 (highest level offender.)”

The law also explicitly states that the court “shall not prohibit such sentenced offender from using the internet in connection with education, lawful employment, or search for lawful employment.”

As of last year, 25,000 former sex offenders were subject to E-stop.

Dec 25, 2009

Reform Across the Hudson

There's a great op-ed in today's New York Times in support of a set of proposed reforms in New Jersey that would help reentrants more smoothly transition to their neighborhoods while reducing both recidivism and prison costs.

From the article, here's what the reforms would accomplish:

"An ex-offender could not be disqualified for employment unless the offense was directly related to the job. Job seekers would no longer be required to disclose convictions on applications for state, county or municipal jobs. The offenses could still be uncovered in background checks, but they would no longer automatically rule out an applicant from the start.

The bill would lift the state ban on food stamps and welfare benefits for people with felony drug convictions and would expand education and training opportunities for inmates. And it would end an odious practice under which the prison system earns a profit by overcharging poor families for the collect calls they receive from relatives inside a system. The added cost sometimes forces families to choose between putting food on the table or letting a child speak to an incarcerated parent."

Dec 22, 2009

Second Chance Act Grant Solicitation Released

The U.S. Department of Justice's Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) and Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) released the solicitation for Second Chance Act grant applications to state and local governments for adult and juvenile reentry demonstration projects (Section 101).

Funding under this section is available to help state and local agencies implement programs and strategies to reduce recidivism and ensure the safe and successful reentry of adults and juveniles released from prisons and jails back to the community.

To download the solicitation or find out more about the grant program, click here.

The deadline for applications is 8:00 p.m. ET on March 4, 2010.

Dec 21, 2009

Glenn Martin on Fox News This Morning

Glenn Martin will be on Fox News' The Strategy Room's Crime Hour today (12/21/09) at 11:40 AM. Glenn will be discussing the Fortune Society's effort to fight employment discrimination for job-seekers with a criminal conviction history. Through December, the Fortune Society, a Task Force member agency, placed a billboard in Time Square to highlight the challenges facing job-seekers with a criminal conviction. The billboard is in place through New Years, over 25 million people are expected to see it. To view the show online visit: www.foxnews.com/strategyroom.

Dec 19, 2009

Finding a Job: An Interesting Approach

A story in today's New York Times describes Michael Johnson's tactic for finding a job after having spent time in prison.

Although not required, he clips a note to any job application he submits, saying, "'I have been convicted of a nontheft, nonviolent felony over 11 years ago,' it reads. 'I take full responsibility for my actions and have succeeded in turning my life around. I understand the stigma that is attached with a felony and will make it my mission to prove that I am trustworthy, dependable and hard-working.'"

There's also an unexpected -- and charming -- romantic aspect to Mr. Johnson's story.

Dec 14, 2009

State Reentry Leaders Gather

"We want to return to a balanced approach," Andrea Evans, Chairperson of the New York State Division of Parole, told an audience of reentry leaders gathered in Saratoga Springs, NY. She was joined by the state's other criminal justice and treatment commissioners: Brain Fischer, Commissioner of the State Division of Correctional Services, Karen Carpenter- Commissioner of the Office of Alcohol and Substance Abuse Services, and Deputy Secretary Denise O'Donnell. The conference was sponsored by the NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services and U.S Bureau of Justice Assistance.

Commissioner Palumbo proclaimed that Rockefeller drug law reform should be renamed "Patterson drug law reform", after Governor David Patterson who signed into law the most sweeping reforms of New York State's drug laws in April.

New York State is in the midst of a ten-year justice reform effort following the National Institute of Corrections' Transition from Prison to Community (TPC) model. The reforms include: the development of local County Reentry Task Force programs, adoption of an actuarial risk and needs assessment tool, cognitive behavioral interventions, and enhanced in-prison substance abuse and mental health.

The rising cost of incarceration is helping to spur the need for reform. In New York, according to Commissioner Palumbo, it cost $40,000 per year on average to house a state inmate, compared to $30,000 for inpatient drug treatment, and $10,000 for outpatient drug treatment.

While the effort to reform the state's criminal justice system is truly historic, much remains to be done. Many, including some in the audience, point to some key challenges. Next year's gubernatorial election will undoubtedly slow progress. Also, long time parole and corrections officers may resist efforts that, while "evidence-based," entail some fundamental changes in the way they work. The state's worsening budget could also stall efforts.

NY State: Juvenile Justice is Worse Than We Thought

The NY Times profiled the failings of the New York State juvenile justice system today. The task force that wrote the report (staffed by the Vera Institute of Justice and chaired by Jeremy Travis, the president of John Jay College of Criminal Justice) was spurred to investigation in 2008 after years of complaints about the facilities. [Click here for another recent article in the times about the state of juvenile justice in New York State.] The report notes that these facilities are both costly and ineffective, and cites the following factors to describe the problems at hand:

"The prisons are meant to house youths considered dangerous to themselves or others, but there is no standardized statewide system for assessing such risks, the report found.

In 2007, more than half of the youths who entered detention centers were sent there for the equivalent of misdemeanor offenses, in many cases theft, drug possession or even truancy. More than 80 percent were black or Latino, even though blacks and Latinos make up less than half the state’s total youth population — a racial disparity that has never been explained, the report said.

Many of those detained have addictions or psychological illnesses for which less restrictive treatment programs were not available. Three-quarters of children entering the juvenile justice system have drug or alcohol problems, more than half have had a diagnosis of mental health problems and one-third have developmental disabilities.

Yet there are only 55 psychologists and clinical social workers assigned to the prisons, according to the task force. And none of the facilities employ psychiatrists, who have the authority to prescribe the drugs many mentally ill teenagers require.

While 76 percent of youths in custody are from the New York City area, nearly all the prisons are upstate, and the youths’ relatives, many of them poor, cannot afford frequent visits, cutting them off from support networks."

For a copy of the Task Force's full recommendations for reform, click here.

Dec 13, 2009

On the Power of Consistency and Discipline

by Kate Krontiris, Master in Public Policy Candidate, Harvard Kennedy School of Government

This week, we had a chance to talk with Andres Idarraga, who is a second-year law student at Yale Law School. Mr. Idarraga has a unique story: while spending six-and-a-half years in prison for selling drugs, he began to read voraciously, eventually tutoring other students in GED courses, and completing some college courses by correspondence. After some time at the University of Rhode Island upon release, Mr. Idarraga was accepted to Brown University, where he completed his Bachelor’s degree. Just before he takes his final exams this semester, Mr. Idarraga made time to share his story with Rethinking Reentry.


1. Tell us a little bit about what you are pursuing now -- what do you hope to do when you graduate from Yale Law School?

Right now, I’m taking law classes in administrative law, federal income tax law, and business organizations, and I am a student member of the education adequacy law clinic. I’m also teaching constitutional law to 11th and 12th graders at a local high school. Next semester, I will join the school’s community and economic development clinic.

The two areas that really interest me are education and community economic development. Last summer, I interned at the ACLU’s Racial Justice Program, where I worked mostly on education cases. I worked on a case where a private for-profit corporation was delivering alternative education services to students who had been kicked out of their home schools. There were several problems with how this model was functioning, resulting in violations of students’ legal rights. At the education clinic at Yale, we are working on an education suit against the State of Connecticut, which alleges that the way Connecticut funds its public schools does not meet the state’s constitutional requirements. There has been a huge legal battle over the interpretation of states’ right–to-education clauses throughout the country. The way that states interpret these clauses affects the way they fund education. We allege that Connecticut’s funding formula fails to provide poor students with an “adequate and equal education” as required by the state constitution.

In the economic development realm, I plan to help homeowners deal with mortgage foreclosures and the collapse of the housing market. The community and economic development clinic also provides legal services to smaller not well-financed entrepreneurs. At the structural level, I’m interested in the delivery of government programs to distressed community. For example, once an economic development program is in place, how do we ensure that it reaches the right people?

In terms of personal goals, I want to bring the culture of education to my own family, particularly my younger brother, nephew and cousins. I hope to normalize education within my own family. I am the first in my family to graduate from high school and college, and to go on to graduate school. But I do not want to be the only one. I think it’s important to make stories of success the norm and this begins within my family unit. At the same time, I hope to play a role in delivering effective educational services to disadvantaged communities.

2. What made you the type of person to take adversity and turn it around? Do you feel you have some special qualities or experiences that make you an exception, or do you think more guys and gals in prison would do the same if they could?



I do not believe I have any special qualities. I think that more people could do it and should do it. Growing up, I had friends and family members going in and out of prison – when it first happened to me, in the circumstances I grew up in, I thought that it was the norm. But when I was first sent to a maximum-security prison, and I saw many young kids doing life sentences, I thought, “Wow, this could be me or my younger brother spending the rest of our lives in prison.” This was when the reality of the situation hit me. The system doesn’t really care who they put away – nor should they. It is there to deal with the consequences of criminal actions and to punish people for them. But to be around so many young people doing very long prison sentences really shocked me. Unlike them, I was going to be able to go home again – and that sparked me to say, “I have this second chance. What am I going to do with it?”

Although I was raised by my mother, it was my father who brought us to this country. My parents grew up really poor in rural Colombia. My dad looked at the U.S. with that immigrant gaze, thinking that when he got here, it would be the land of great opportunity. My dad had no education, and he made great sacrifices. My mother also worked hard to provide for my brother and me. As much as my parents struggled to provide a better life for me, their reward was seeing me in prison. I felt like I owed a debt to them. I recognized the struggles my family made for me.

One thing that happened by chance was that I became a GED tutor for other students in prison and I discovered that I loved teaching other students. I loved explaining things to them. As I developed a passion for helping others to further their education, I also developed a hunger to continuously learn more things for myself. I ate up every book in the library and through those books, I began to envision myself as something different. From that point, things changed. I took college classes while I was still incarcerated. However, I was by no means the most talented person in prison. There were and are many other people in prison who could and should do it.

A personal advantage I had was that, even though my mom did not have any money and struggled in many ways, she supported me tremendously while I was in prison. I knew that my home situation was better than a lot of the guys and that gave me a distinct advantage. When a person does not have a stable foundation, he or she can’t take the next steps.

One last thing I want to emphasize is that while I was teaching and reading, I internalized, very deeply, a framework that was almost delusional at the time. This was that a person can accomplish absolutely anything, regardless of the circumstances, if he or she works hard enough. I remember applying to Brown University from my prison cell and the guards would see my mail with “Brown University” on it. They would look at me like, “This kid is delusional. What is he thinking?” But I had this firm belief that I was talented and I could get into college if I applied myself. I think many people who have grown up in disadvantaged circumstances have developed an ingrained, perverted mentality that they can’t do something, or that they can’t have certain experiences because they are reserved for more privileged people.

2. So many people in prison are illiterate. Are there ways that you think even the lowest-level learners could be encouraged to pursue their education?

That is an interesting, much harder question for me. When a person begins at such a disadvantage, how does that person map out a 10,000-mile journey concretely and systematically? You have to be able to answer the questions that person maybe asking himself: what are the greatest obstacles and what are the rewards of learning to read? When that person is able to see the whole process, or see people who have been through it, it gives him a wider vision and a roadmap, something different from “I’m too far back to even try.”

I have several friends who have come home from prison and are now pursuing college or vocational programs. They may have initially taken some classes in prison just to kill time, but when they saw me achieve something concrete by going on to college once released, they realized the possible significance of their daily actions. So instead of working aimlessly and taking classes just to kill time, the goal at the end of the journey became more concrete for them.

People beginning at a lower level have a longer journey. It must be explained to them what the good parts and the difficult parts of the journey will be and they must be assisted in coming up with their end-goals. For this, they should be asked what they want to accomplish by learning to read or, even more generally, what they want to accomplish when they come home. The goal is to get them to firmly realize the benefits of learning to read.

3. What advice do you have for policymakers around prison education? How would you suggest the discharge process be adjusted to support the educational goals of persons leaving prison?



Personally, I didn’t have any institutional support from the prison to pursue my educational goals when I was getting out. It’s funny -- I learned about applying to college and applying for financial aid from a USA Today article that described both processes step-by-step. There were 10 to 15 steps and I followed them all. It was like, “Step 1: Figure out where you want to go and write them a letter asking for a brochure. Step 2: Apply for FAFSA, etc.”

So, for people leaving prison, it could be as simple as providing them with a step-by-step guide, especially about financial aid for college. There are federal programs available that will provide funds for low-income people that want to pursue their education. Pell Grants provide free money to go to college. Many people in prison don’t know about this, and even prisoner reentry non-profit groups don’t know enough about it. Some people think that, because they have a criminal conviction, they are barred from any federal money for school. True, they might have to jump through more hoops, but it’s not impossible. Maybe another idea is for teachers in prison to identify students who have expressed an interest in going to college and then provide those students with classes about the process.

I think the broader prison education policy point is that prison education pays for itself in abundance. You can look at the recidivism rates or the successes of people who have accomplished getting their education. The Bard Prison Initiative is one great program that comes to mind, where Bard professors go into prisons and actually grant degrees for the courses that students take. [Click here for a 60 Minutes segment on the Bard Prison Initiative.] But it is hard for the public, especially in tough economic times, to swallow the bitter pill of seeing education services go to a population that is stigmatized as not deserving of a publicly-funded education. Still, we need to have a communal dialogue with the public about this issue. Delivering educational services to prisoners could potentially make a big dent in incarceration costs.


4. Who in your life encouraged you on this path? It is rare that someone just does this without the mentoring or support of some key person(s) in their life. How did you develop and nurture the relationships you made along the way?

To name one person would be unfair – it was so many people. However, nobody comes to your help unless you are willing to help yourself first. As soon as you show that you are hungry for a better life, people are more than willing to help out.

Back in junior high and high school, when I was doing well, I had a lot of teachers who gave me great advice. I wasn’t able to appreciate their efforts then, but I was able to reflect on them when I was in prison.

In prison, when I started thinking about applying to college, an old friend from high school would type up my handwritten letters for me and research whatever I needed on the internet. At the University of Rhode Island, a professor encouraged me to apply to Brown and helped me with the process.

When I applied to law school, the director of the prison system (himself a Yale Law graduate) became a huge supporter. I also developed a friendship with a law professor who had grown up in my neighborhood. He was someone who had grown up in troubled circumstances, but made it to the local community college. He transferred to a four-year college and ended up graduating from Harvard Law. He helps me with the books I need for law school. I am blessed to have a community of people who have extended their hands to help me on this journey.

In general, people sometimes may be reluctant to help out a formerly incarcerated individual because they may have misgivings about that person. They think they may be taking a chance. Therefore, the ex-felon must be willing to take the first step by showing any potential allies what they have done before reaching out for assistance. By showing initiative, the formerly incarcerated can build the credibility and trust needed to secure support from others.

For the formerly incarcerated, they can’t take any initial rejection as a value judgment made on their character. People may not be making such a judgment, but may feel they are taking a chance in the unknown by supporting an ex-felon. We need to understand their point of view and to allay their concerns.

One last thing I want to re-emphasize is the power of small, consistent, disciplined steps. Creating the big picture in your mind and believing it will materialize, all the while taking the concerted daily actions necessary to make it so, is very powerful. Consistency and discipline make up for many, many things in our lives.


Photo credit Brown University/John Abromowski.

Dec 9, 2009

New National Statistics on Corrections Populations

The Bureau of Justice Statistics has just released two bulletins that examine the numbers of prisoners and individuals under probation or parole supervision in the nation for 2008 and report on related trends—including an overall increase in the number of individuals being released from federal and state prisons.

The bulletins were posted on the National Reentry Resource Center website, which is a new place to find information about reentry.

Dec 3, 2009

NYC Justice Corps Making Difference







By: Amelia Thompson, Project Administrator & Debbie Mukamal, Director, John Jay College Prisoner Reentry Institute.


The NYC Justice Corps brings young adults involved with the criminal justice system together with their communities to identify and address unmet community needs. Through meaningful and reparative service to their communities, internships and jobs, and educational opportunities, the Justice Corps provides members with practical skills, social support and leadership training. By actively partnering with the Justice Corps, communities own the success and reintegration of their young people as contributing members of society. One of 40 anti-poverty initiatives developed by Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Commission on Economic Opportunity, the NYC Justice Corps was spearheaded by Commission member Jeremy Travis, President of John Jay College of Criminal Justice, and Martin Horn, former Commissioner of the New York City Departments of Correction and Probation. The Justice Corps launched in September 2008 in two target neighborhoods -- Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn and the South Bronx. This year, the Justice Corps will serve 250 young adults.
Combining best practices in workforce development, service learning and youth development, the NYC Justice Corps is a six-month model that transitions Corps members in cohorts through training (1 month), community benefit project service (10-14 weeks), and internships (minimum of 6 weeks). The goal is to place Justice Corps graduates in permanent employment and/or in school, and reduce rates of poverty and recidivism in the target communities. While enrolled in the Justice Corps, Corps members receive weekly stipends for their participation.
The Justice Corps also seeks to instill in Corps members the importance of developing a positive relationship to their own community. Corps members develop and work on community benefit service projects, including renovating interior public office space, weatherizing low-income housing, and painting socially conscious and inspiring public murals. The Justice Corps has demonstrated success in recruiting and maintaining the engagement of young adults in its rigorous program model. In the first program year, 276 Corps members were served, 97% of whom completed the job readiness/service learning phase, 81% completed three months of community benefit project service, and 50% completed internships. A rigorous outcome evaluation based on a random assignment design is being conducted to determine the long-term impact of program engagement and completion on the Corps members and their communities.
The Justice Corps welcomes opportunities to partner with employers interested in hosting Corps interns or employing Corps graduates. Community-based organizations are also welcome to host meaningful service projects that support community development in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn and the South Bronx.
The Prisoner Reentry Institute at John Jay College manages the development of the NYC Justice Corps. Bedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corps and Phipps Development Corp. provide direct services to young adults in their neighborhoods. The Center for Employment Opportunities provides technical assistance to the two community-based organizations.For more information about the NYC Justice Corps, see http://www.nycjusticecorps.org/ or contact Ali Knight, Director of the NYC Justice Corps at the Prisoner Reentry Institute at John Jay College of Criminal Justice (alknight@jjay.cuny.edu; 646.557.4532).