Historic Harlem Court House

The Harlem Community Justice Center's Reentry Services are located in East Harlem

2013 Reentry Graduation starts with a song

The choir started off the celebration this year at the Reentry Court Graduation

Family Reentry Summer Celebration

During the summer, we host a block party and celebration for Reentry clients and their families

Reentry Graduation

Young man thanks his Parole Officer for keeping him on track

Harlem Reentry Graduation

Families join to celebrate the accomplishments of graduates

Showing posts with label Reentry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reentry. Show all posts

Aug 11, 2011

Consenting to Confinement: Sex Offenders Overwhelmingly Waiving Their Right to Trial Before Civil Confinement

This week's New York Law Journal reports that nearly 92 percent of sex offenders civilly confined following the completion of their prison sentence have waived their right to trial since the passage of the Sex Offender Management and Treatment Act, thereby consenting to indefinite confinement.

Under the Sex Offender Management and Treatment Act, which took effect in 2007, upon completion of a criminal sentence, the state can continue confining a sex offender upon proof of "clear and convincing evidence" (a high legal standard) that the individual suffers from a "mental abnormality" that predisposes him or her to commit sex crimes. The respondent has the right to a  jury trial and a unanimous verdict is required for confinement.

Although 20% of individuals who were confined for a sex offense win at trial (and are therefore released to parole or set free), most are opting to remain confined.  The question is why? Officials have been very surprised by the choice to forgo trial since the worst outcome of trial is confinement.

Attorneys who represent clients in civil confinement cases say that many sex offenders know the great barriers to reentry they will confront upon release. Residency restrictions forbid them from living in many areas and many housing providers exclude sex offenders from transitional housing. For example, in New York City, if the offender an is under parole or probation supervision, the individual may not live within 1,000 feet of a school or other facility caring for children. Getting a job is no less of a feat. With no social safety net,  former sex offenders fear they will end up homeless and marginalized. 

Dr. Wulfert, Professor of Psychology suggests that "many offenders assume confinement is inevitable, and some may realize they cannot control their impulses, do not trust themselves, and genuinely do not want to reoffend....They may also want to avoid more humiliation..."

Others suggest that consenting to confinement may be a "strategic move" hoping that "if they readily admit they have a problem the courts may be more receptive to releasing them in a year or so when they come up for mandatory annual review."


Dec 25, 2009

Reform Across the Hudson

There's a great op-ed in today's New York Times in support of a set of proposed reforms in New Jersey that would help reentrants more smoothly transition to their neighborhoods while reducing both recidivism and prison costs.

From the article, here's what the reforms would accomplish:

"An ex-offender could not be disqualified for employment unless the offense was directly related to the job. Job seekers would no longer be required to disclose convictions on applications for state, county or municipal jobs. The offenses could still be uncovered in background checks, but they would no longer automatically rule out an applicant from the start.

The bill would lift the state ban on food stamps and welfare benefits for people with felony drug convictions and would expand education and training opportunities for inmates. And it would end an odious practice under which the prison system earns a profit by overcharging poor families for the collect calls they receive from relatives inside a system. The added cost sometimes forces families to choose between putting food on the table or letting a child speak to an incarcerated parent."

Nov 11, 2009

Back on Track in San Francisco

Prosecutors across the country are seeing the value in targeting reentry as a public safety issue -- indeed, the prevention of recidivism through drug treatment, accountability measures, and other support mechanisms means fewer crimes and safer streets. In Brooklyn DA Charles J. Hynes was a leader on this front with the successful ComAlert Program.

Kamala D. Harris, the elected District Attorney of San Francisco, is one of these enlightened DA's and has an article in the Huffington Post about "Back On Track," a reentry program designed for nonviolent, first-time drug offenders.

There have been some good results for the program:

"For this population, the recidivism (or re-offense rate) is typically 50 percent or higher. Four years since the creation of this initiative, recidivism has been less than 10 percent among Back On Track graduates. And the program costs only $5,000 per person, compared to over $35,000 a year for county jail. That saves our city roughly $1 million per year in jail costs alone. When you add in the total expense of criminal prosecutions to taxpayers, including court costs, public defenders, state prison, and probation, the savings are closer to $2 million. And we cannot even begin to quantify the value of these individuals' future productivity, taxes and child support payments, or the brightened prospects for their families."

For more about Kamala D. Harris, who is the first woman District Attorney in San Francisco's history and the first African American woman in California to hold the office, click here.

Oct 16, 2009

Georgia Reentry Effort Mirrors New York's Success


A new jail reentry effort begun by Fulton County, Georgia, is modeled on a similar successful effort pioneered in New York City. Fulton County is about half the size of New York City, but has almost the same amount of jail consumers -- 13,800 -- according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution article.

Oct 7, 2009

New! National Reentry Resource Center Website

The Council of State Governments, in partnership with the Urban Institute, the Association of State Correctional Administrators, the American Probation and Parole Association, and a national advisory board; has just launched a great new reentry resource. Established under the Second Chance Act, the National Reentry Resource Center disseminates information about reentry issues and promotes best practices in the field.

Their goals:
  • Provide a one-stop, interactive source of current, user-friendly reentry information.
  • Identify, document, and promote evidence-based practices.
  • Deliver individualized, targeted technical assistance to the Second Chance Act grantees.
  • Advance the reentry field through training, distance learning, and knowledge development.
Why this is helping for you:

The site lists funding opportunities, has a searchable database of program examples, offers research on a number of different topics related to reentry, and provides information about how to start your own reentry initiative. Importantly, there is a set of resources just for people who are returning from prison, many of them created by partners of the Upper Manhattan Reentry Task Force.

Check it out!

Oct 5, 2009

Guns, Legitimacy, and Social Networks

On average, 14,000 guns per year are recovered from the streets of Chicago.
Let's repeat: 14,000.

Some other facts to consider:
  • In New York, the homicide rate is about 9 homicides per 100,000 people. In Chicago, it is roughly 18 homicides per 100,000 people (2008 data).

  • About 80% of Chicago's murders involve an illegal firearm and most are in some way connected to gang-related disputes.
Andrew Papachristos, a professor of sociology at the University of Massachusetts and a research fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government, has begun making sense of these facts by examining social networks and gun offenders' perceptions of legal authority. At a presentation to Harvard Law School today (and in a paper due to be published shortly), Papachristos found the following:

"gun offenders (just like noncriminals) are more likely to comply with the law when they believe in (a) the substance of the law, and (b) the legitimacy of legal actors, especially the police. Moreover, we find that opinions of compliance to the law are not uniformly distributed across the sample population. In other words, not all criminals are alike in their opinions of the law. Gang members -- but especially gang members with social networks saturated with criminal associates -- are significantly less likely to view the law and its agents as a legitimate form of authority. However, those individuals (including gang members) with less saturated criminal networks actually tend to have more positive opinions of the law, albeit these opinions are still overall negative."

What does this mean?

Looking at a sample of 150 gun offenders in 54 Chicago police beats, Papachristos finds that "criminals" obey the law for much the same reasons that law-abiding citizens obey the law: they feel a moral obligation to do so and think that most laws are right, fair, and just. The difference, according to survey data, is about treatment by the police: most gun offenders do not believe that the police treat most people with respect. In fact, Papachristos and his colleagues found that respect for the police is the only predictor of whether gun offenders perceive the law as a legitimate authority. More than deterrence strategies or prosecutorial outcomes, what cops do matters a lot in offenders' perceptions of procedural justice.

Interestingly, gang members are actually more likely to believe in the substance of the law -- Papachristos wisely notes that there is a non-trivial respect for authority among gang members (think of the Sopranos if you need a pop culture reference) -- but their networks have huge influence on their favorable perceptions of the law. The more people in your network who are engaging in criminal behavior, the more you learn from those people about being a criminal. Papachristos' data shows that gang members whose network ties are more than 50% saturated with other criminal actors are more likely to engage in criminal behavior themselves. Additionally, the more you believe in the legitimacy of the law, the less likely you are to carry a gun. There are not very strong effects for social networks in terms of promoting gun carrying, but these effects are strong for specific, non-planned behaviors (like getting into a fight).

The conclusion we can draw here is that government entities seeking to encourage law-obiding behavior among gun offenders would do well to promote their own legitimacy in the eyes of the offenders. Policies targeted toward improving these perceptions (which might involve de-saturating networks of criminal influences or improving the police-community relationship) could have a perceptible impact on gun violence.

So why does this matter for reentry?

One of Papachristos' key conclusions is that successful reentry is really the problem at hand: he notes that two-thirds of the sample participants have prior felony convictions. The City of Chicago and the U.S. Attorney's Office Northern District of Illinois have implemented a Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN) initiative, which is a federally-funded model for reducing neighborhood crime problems. One of the components of this initiative is regular "roundtable meetings," where returning gun offenders sit down with law enforcement officers, successful reentrants, and representatives of community agencies for a restorative justice conversation. After a message from police officers about the surveillance that will be conducted on them ("We are going to get you if you re-offend, and here's how"), ex-gang members share their turnaround stories and service providers are on hand to offer immediate connections to employment, mental health counseling, and housing opportunities. The results from these forums are promising: Project Safe Neighborhoods evaluations indicate that, as the percentage of active offenders in the neighborhood who attend the meeting increases, the neighborhood-level homicide rate decreases. Additionally, forum participants are less likely to re-offend for several varieities of crime when compared to several different control groups.

In the coming week, we'll be sitting down with Professor Papachristos to get a more detailed picture of gun violence in Chicago and the lessons to be learned for anti-gun violence projects in New York City.

What questions do you have for him?
Send them over and we'll do our best to ask!

Sep 27, 2009

California's Parole Problems with Sex Offenders

Today's NY Times has a pretty good article about California's troubles managing paroled sex offenders (and parolees in general). As you may know, California's budget crisis has forced it to close a number of prison facilities and now large number of people will be released to parole supervision. Additionally, as the article notes, reentrants will not be sent back to prison for "technical violations" -- or those infractions that include missing your curfew, abusing alcohol or a controlled substance, failing to go to work -- as they have been in the past. Interestingly, this is actually good policy in general. The idea that people's addictions or curfew problems can be addressed with a community-based solution instead of more prison time has been tested by the Harlem Parole Reentry Court over the past ten years and the results have been positive in terms of reducing recidivism. Hopefully, California will be able to create statewide infrastructure that supports this kind of intervention. (Budget cuts are hurting everywhere -- take a look at this article about the elimination of financing for California's Domestic Violence Program. Also, Gov. Schwarzenegger recently enacted an 80 percent cut in Proposition 36, the state’s largest drug treatment diversion program)

Today's article does a really good job of laying out how difficult it is to parole people with sex offenses. There are logistical challenges like finding them a place to live -- nobody wants to live near or with a sex offender -- helping them maintain employment, and keeping an unpredictable surveillance operation going. On top of all this, most paroled sex offenders battle mental illnesses that promote their illegal behavior and many use drugs or alcohol to self-medicate. Although parole officers with this specialized caseload will see the number of people they supervise decrease from 70 to 45, it is an open question as to whether cuts to other key services (like drug treatment) will put these officers in even more of a bind.

Jun 23, 2009

Women & Reentry


Yesterday's National Public Radio's Tell Me More segment hosted by Michel Martin focused on the challanges faced by women leaving prison. To hear the segment click here.

Jun 22, 2009

Reentry News Round-Up

Vinyl Ready Art - Rodeo


We noticed several recent news items on prisoner reentry that we thought might be of interest to readers.

Parolees Face Challanges Paying Child Support
St Joseph News-Press, Missouri
http://www.stjoenews.net/news/2009/jun/21/parolees-face-challenges-paying-child-support/?local

Employer's Encouraged to offer Ex-Cons Second Chance
The Providence Journal, Rhode Island
http://www.projo.com/news/content/CORRECTIONS_REENTRY_06-21-09_VNEPMOV_v12.328c5aa.html


CCI Reentry Dorm Aids With Job Training and Other Skills (video)
Chillicothe Gazette, Ohio
http://www.chillicothegazette.com/article/20090621/NEWS01/906210306


Re-Entry Coalition Helps Ex-Prisoners


Lynden Tribune, Washington State

http://www.lyndentribune.com/node/4540


Women Who've Done Time Guide Those Newly Released


Arizona Daily Star, Arizona


http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=20331982&BRD=1817&PAG=461&dept_id=222087&rfi=6